Wednesday, July 24, 2013

The Wiener Tragedy: Anthony and Huma...

It is not only a tragedy, it is appalling that anyone would allow such despicable treatment of a woman at the hands of such a deeply disturbed man.

What Christian, what Jew allows the public flogging of what is obviously a helpless woman at the hands of an abusive husband?

He too has obviously been deprived of serious religious caring.

It does not matter that she is a Muslim.

It matters that We are Christians or Jews.

Where are the Christian Conservative or Jewish Women rising to her defense?

Where are the Christian Conservative Men or Jewish Men rising to her defense?

Many are laughing at a family that is unraveling, literally in front of the entire world.

Most of us know they will not get any help from their political cronies.  They will be shunned, reviled, ridiculed, and left to fend for themselves in the cold, political, desert night.

Can one of us approach them with forgiveness?  Are we so shallow that we fear being rejected by them?  Are we so callously political that we are to revel in their misfortune?

I say refuse to shun them.

Forgive them.  Offer them help. Wisdom.

Anthony's very public abuse of his wife is the very public abuse of all women.

These are two lost souls. Who are we to cast stones against them?

We, Christians, have a New Testament to which we subscribe.

We are not the people who cast away Lives into the garbage heap.

Let others revel in the tragedy of another.

Pray for them:
“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.  
For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’  
“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?  
When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 
When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ 
The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
We are the American Conservative Cultural Revolution.

This is what we do. This is who we are.

Help Them.


Friday, July 19, 2013

"It's All About ME"... President Victim Inserts Himself Into Martin/Zimmerman Tragedy...

Just a few weeks ago O'Socialist was a Nelson Mandela wannabe, inserting himself into the news about Mandela's illness, while he (O'Socialist) was touting rights and freedoms for homosexuals in Africa.

When the Martin/Zimmerman tragedy was being made controversial by the Socialist Liberal Media (SLIME), our Nobel Prize winning President was inserting himself into that issue by saying that Trayvon Martin could have been his son.

Today it's "poor me, Trayvon Martin could have been me."

Of course it could have been him.  It could have been anyone, but, of course, not everyone is going around playing the victim.

There are three parts to this Victim Game the President is inviting you to play:

1.  Persecutor  2.  Rescuer   3.  Victim.

You can call this the PRV (PERV) Triangle.  This is a game described long ago by a man named Eric Berne, who wrote a book called "Games People Play."  He listed this particular game as a destructive game, not a healthy one.  Each "role" (Persecutor, Rescuer, Victim) entices, invites, or triggers, the other roles, so it was Berne's goal to identify the game, so that those who could spot it could "step outside" of the game and not be subject to its effects.  This was part of a form of therapy Berne developed called Transactional Analysis.  I am not here to argue pro or against T.A.  I only wish to point out the application of the PERV game with respect to racial politics and the manipulation by this agent provocateur-community organizer pretending to be President.

It appears that when someone assumes any of the three "roles" in that game, of PERV, it can stimulate, invite, entice, or trap someone else into identifying with that role, or identifying and assuming the role of one or the other roles.  It's a trick, like a spider luring its prey into a spider web that they can then not wrestle themselves out of.

By assuming the "victim" role, he sets up anyone who does not agree with him as either a rescuer or a persecutor.  The Rescuer will want to "rescue" the poor sod. The one trapped into being a persecutor by getting defensive will be deemed a villain.

There are no winners in this game, except that all participants "win" a LOSS, that is, everyone loses, and that is the end result of that game: Everyone loses, and losing is their "payoff."  (Note: this is a brief explanation of the game, and not a thorough exposition about it, as you may have already concluded.)

So how does one counter this destructive political tactic?

To be "outside" of the PERV game, simply refuse to play it.  Step outside of it. Identify it to others, and urge them not to play. There are many ways to refuse to play the game, such as:  "We understand that you might have been a victim at one time, but today you are not a victim, and it is not proper, nor correct for you to be covertly positioning others as victims, rescuers, or persecutors because you are a President of ALL the people and you should be rising above any racial conflict and uniting the nation, not dividing it."

I'm not advocating that you put that in a petition, but it might not hurt to do so.

The key here, is to not take the bait, and jump into the PERV triangle, because it is a set-up to make you lose.

And, by the way, anytime you enter that triangle you are subject to switching roles, and not always "voluntarily."

This is a despicable "game" to play, but it is used in personal relationships, as well as in group settings, and certainly in the political arena, and can be very destructive.

To the extent that it is being used on a national level, it would behoove anyone to opt out of this game for the good of the nation.

You might try to identify the various "players" in the game. For example, this administration casts the Tea Party and Conservatives in the roles of persecutors.  The Socialist Liberal Media (SLIME) have assumed the roles of "rescuers" (of the Obamistas).  And, of course, you have the Victim-In-Chief, Barack Obama, who often has even appeared publicly as a "victim" almost asking to be "rescued."

That is, of course, when he's not casting his voting blocs into the roles of victims, who are being persecuted by... well, you know who.

To be fair the other side of the political coin also plays the game.  Currently victimized Tea Partiers are being persecuted by the IRS.

Traditionally and culturally, however, Conservatives do not play the victim role very well, because being victims is not part of their spiritual or political philosophy.  Conservatives aspire to and practice Responsibility, Accountability, and tend to shun persecution and victimhood.

This is not bad thing for Conservatives to have, but it does make them vulnerable, when the Socialists turn on the PERV game, because, as the Soc's play victim, the Conservatives tend to get defensive, and wind up on the persecutor side of the equation.

And when you have a "rescuer" Socialist Liberal Media (SLIME), you have a perpetuity of the PERV game beaming into the multitude's consciousness day in and day out.  The only way to step outside of the PERV game in this instance is to create an alternative to the SLIME, and that would be Conservative or Tea Party media. That only works, though, if you turn off the SLIME, which shouldn't be too hard to do, since statistics show very few people watch them anyway.

Please note that I am not advocating for a "rescuer" media for Conservatives.  That's not something we need or want.  We do want a media that does its job, and by creating this media we begin to create at the grass-roots level a positive culture by promoting positively its values.

We already have a Conservative media aborning. It deserves your attention and support in order to grow and make extinct the SLIME and the Imperialist Socialist Sociopathic Culture of Mass Murder, which has a colonial grip on the American nation.

Vanguard of Freedom

Back to:  Red Clix Headliners...

Post comments/feedback HERE...

FRIENDS Of Vanguard Of Freedom HERE...

Vanguard Of Freedom Information...Discussion...Debate...

HEADLINERS:  The Red Clix Linx...



Thursday, July 18, 2013

Gov. To Judge: Please Drop This Case; We Didn't Know We Violated His Constitutional Rights...

Marine Veteran, Brandon Raub, was falsely arrested, forcibly detained, involuntarily held at a psychiatric facility for a week, and the FBI, Secret Service, and Local Police now argue that his claim against them should be dropped because they did not know they were violating his Constitutional rights. Raub's lawyers want the court to deny the Feds the motion to dismiss the case.

"...In asking the court to reject motions to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the arresting officers and mental health workers involved in Raub’s involuntary commitment, Institute attorneys challenged the government officials’ contentions that they did not know they were violating Raub’s First and Fourth Amendment rights, as well as the manner in which Virginia’s civil commitment statutes are being used to silence individuals engaged in lawfully exercising their free speech rights..."

The reason he was arrested, in the first place, was because of alleged controversial song lyrics and political views posted on his Facebook page.

Court documents show that Raub, was seized and detained as part of the federal government's "Operation Vigilant Eagle," a program that "...involves the systematic surveillance of military veterans who express views critical of the government..."

The existence of this program itself, the specific targeting of a particular group, in this case military veterans, is of course, itself, unconstitutional, but let's leave that for another article at another time.

In the Brandon Raub case, the government released Raub, after he lawyered up with civil rights attorney, John Whitehead, of the Rutherford Institute, who came to his aid, after being contacted by Raub's family, after his arrest on August 16, 2012.

The events leading up to his release include the following:
"...On Aug. 16, 2012, Chesterfield police, Secret Service and FBI agents arrived at Brandon Raub’s home, asking to speak with him about his Facebook posts. Like many Facebook users, Raub, a Marine who has served tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, uses his Facebook page to post song lyrics and air his political opinions. Without providing any explanation, levying any charges against Raub or reading him his rights, law enforcement officials handcuffed Raub and transported him to police headquarters, then to John Randolph Medical Center, where he was held against his will. In a hearing on Aug. 20, mental health personnel allegedly pointed to Raub’s Facebook posts as the reason for his incarceration. While Raub stated that the Facebook posts were being read out of context, a Special Justice ordered Raub be held up to 30 more days for psychological evaluation and treatment..." (according to Rutherford Institute Statement dated: July 17, 2013)
The Rutherford Institute attorneys declare that:
"...In coming to Raub’s aid, Institute attorneys challenged the government’s actions as procedurally improper, legally unjustified, and in violation of Raub’s First Amendment rights. On Aug. 23, Circuit Court Judge Allan Sharrett ordered Raub’s immediate release, stating that the government’s case was “so devoid of any factual allegations that it could not be reasonably expected to give rise to a case or controversy.”
And a statement from the attorneys says that:
"...In filing suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Institute attorneys asked that the harm done to Raub by government officials be acknowledged, the violation of his First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights be rectified, and damages be awarded for the harm caused by the deprivation of his constitutional rights..."
Principal attorney in the case, President of the Rutherford Institute, John Whitehead said
"...It’s bad enough that the government is targeting military veterans for expressing their discontent over America’s rapid transition to a police state, but for any government official to suggest that they shouldn’t be held accountable for violating a citizen’s rights on the grounds that they were unaware of the Constitution’s prohibitions makes a mockery of our so-called system of representative government..."

Vanguard of Freedom

Back to:  Red Clix Headliners...

Post comments/feedback HERE...

FRIENDS Of Vanguard Of Freedom HERE...

Vanguard Of Freedom Information...Discussion...Debate...

HEADLINERS:  The Red Clix Linx...




Enhanced by Zemanta